Preface; Contents; Rule of Law and Judicial Control of Power; 1 Constitution and Judicial Review: Comparative Analysis; Abstract; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Defence of the Constitution-Constitutional Jurisdiction-Constitutional Justice; 1.2.1 Defence of the Constitution; 1.2.2 Constitutional Jurisdiction; 1.2.3 Constitutional Justice; 1.2.4 Judicial Review; 1.3 Models of Constitutional Control; 1.3.1 American Model; 1.3.1.1 Characteristics; 1.3.2 European Model; 1.3.3 Austrian Model; 1.3.3.1 Current European Model; The Italian Model of Judicial Review; Judicial Review in Germany

Judicial Review in FranceJudicial Review in Portugal; Judicial Review in Spain; 1.4 Conclusions; References; Chile; Other Countries; 2 On the Jurisdictional Control of the Acts of the Government of Romania; Abstract; 2.1 The Government; 2.2 Acts of the Government; 2.3 Control Exerted Over Public Administration; 2.4 Control of Ordinances and Emergency Ordinances Issued by the Government; 2.5 Control of Government Decisions; 2.6 Contentious-Administrative Matters; 2.7 Control Boundaries in Contentious-Administrative Matters

2.8 The Competence of Action Settlement in the Contentious-Administrative2.9 Claim Settlement; 2.9.1 Prior Procedure; 2.9.2 Judgment; 2.10 Indirect Judicial Review; 2.11 Conclusions; References; 3 Judicial Review of Public Power in Poland; Abstract; 3.1 Forms of Public Administration Activity Versus Types of Judicial Review; 3.2 Judicial Review of Law-Making Acts; 3.2.1 Judicial Monopoly of the Constitutional Tribunal and Its Exceptions; 3.2.2 Claim of Hierarchical Non-conformity of Norms in Proceedings Before Administrative Courts

3.3 Judicial Review of the Acts of Application of the Law by Public Administration3.3.1 The Concept of a "Case"; 3.3.2 Matters Outside the Range of Judicial Review Exercised by Administrative Court; 3.4 Constitutional Basis of Administrative Courts' Cognition; 3.5 Range of Cognition of Administrative Courts-Constitutional and Statutory Foundations; References; 4 To Be, or Not to Be, That Is the Question. The Process of Unconstitutionality like an Abstract Judicial Review at the Peruvian Constitution; Abstract; 4.1 The Judicial Review like a Contribution of the United States Judiciary

4.1.1 About the Importance of the Supremacy Clause4.2 The Judicial Review at the Peruvian Constitution; 4.2.1 The Process of Unconstitutionality; 4.2.2 An Open List by a Constitutional Interpretation; 4.2.3 Who Are the Entitled to the Process of Unconstitutionality?; 4.2.4 The Institutions of Direct Democracy and Its Ideological; 4.2.5 A Prescription for Defending Human Rights?; 4.3 The Right of Unconstitutional at the Judicial Practice; References; 5 Judicial Review and Public Power in Kenya: Revisiting Judicial Response to Select Political Cases; Abstract; 5.1 Introduction