Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
About the Authors; List of Figures; List of Tables; 1 Contrastive Rhetoric; 1.1 Introduction and Origins; 1.2 Criticisms of Early Contrastive Rhetoric; 1.3 Expansion of Contrastive Rhetoric; 1.4 Research Considerations; 1.5 Contrastive Chinese-English Studies of Voice and Critical Stance; 1.6 SFL as a Useful Framework for Contrastive Rhetoric Research; 1.7 Attitudinal Evaluation in Chinese University Students' English Writing: A Contrastive Perspective; 2 Evaluation in Student Writing: Constructing Interaction, Voice and Stance; 2.1 Audience Interaction and Student Writing
2.2 Voice, Audience and Student Writing2.3 Voice, Stance and Evaluation; 3 Linguistic Study of Evaluation in Writing; 3.1 Evaluation in Interaction; 3.2 The Appraisal Framework; 3.3 Relevant Studies of Appraisal; 3.4 Specific Enquiry of the Study; 4 A Study of Attitude in Student Writing; 4.1 Contrastive Rhetoric Research with an Expanded Framework and Improved Design; 4.2 University Contexts for the Study; 4.3 Written Data Collection; 4.4 Attitudinal Analysis; 4.4.1 Bottom-Up or Top-Down; 4.4.2 Reading Positions; 4.4.3 Double Coding; 4.4.4 The Coding of Appraisal Values; 4.4.4.1 Affect
Dis/InclinationUn/Happiness; Dis/Satisfaction; In/Security; 4.4.4.2 Appreciation; Reaction; Composition; valuation; 4.4.4.3 Judgement; Normality; Capacity; Tenacity; Propriety; Veracity; 4.5 Validity and Reliability of Appraisal Coding; 4.6 Summary; 5 Appraisal Analysis; 5.1 A Cross-Linguistic Comparison Between English Writing and Chinese Writing: EE and CC; 5.1.1 Affect; 5.1.1.1 Authorial-Affect; 5.1.2 Appreciation; 5.1.3 Judgement; 5.1.4 Summary of the Cross-Linguistic Comparison; 5.2 A Cross-Cultural Comparison Between EE and CEE; 5.2.1 Affect; 5.2.1.1 Authorial-Affect; 5.2.2 Appreciation
5.2.3 Judgment5.2.4 Summary of the Cross-Cultural Comparison; 5.3 A Within-Language Comparison Between CC and CEC; 5.3.1 Attitude; 5.3.2 Affect; 5.3.2.1 Authorial-Affect; 5.3.3 Appreciation; 5.3.4 Judgement; 5.3.5 Summary of the Within-Language Comparison; 5.4 A Within-Subject Comparison Between CEE and CEC; 5.4.1 Attitude; 5.4.2 Affect; 5.4.2.1 Authorial-Affect; 5.4.3 Appreciation; 5.4.4 Judgement; 5.4.5 Summary of the Within-Subject Comparison; 5.5 Summary; 6 Conclusions and Implications; Appendix A: Number of Chinese Characters and Words after Parsing in CEC and CC
Appendix B: Occurrences of Attitude Realisations in EEAppendix C: Occurrences of Attitude Realisations in CC; Appendix D: Occurrences of Attitude Realisations in CEE; Appendix E: Occurrences of Attitude Realisations in CEC; References
2.2 Voice, Audience and Student Writing2.3 Voice, Stance and Evaluation; 3 Linguistic Study of Evaluation in Writing; 3.1 Evaluation in Interaction; 3.2 The Appraisal Framework; 3.3 Relevant Studies of Appraisal; 3.4 Specific Enquiry of the Study; 4 A Study of Attitude in Student Writing; 4.1 Contrastive Rhetoric Research with an Expanded Framework and Improved Design; 4.2 University Contexts for the Study; 4.3 Written Data Collection; 4.4 Attitudinal Analysis; 4.4.1 Bottom-Up or Top-Down; 4.4.2 Reading Positions; 4.4.3 Double Coding; 4.4.4 The Coding of Appraisal Values; 4.4.4.1 Affect
Dis/InclinationUn/Happiness; Dis/Satisfaction; In/Security; 4.4.4.2 Appreciation; Reaction; Composition; valuation; 4.4.4.3 Judgement; Normality; Capacity; Tenacity; Propriety; Veracity; 4.5 Validity and Reliability of Appraisal Coding; 4.6 Summary; 5 Appraisal Analysis; 5.1 A Cross-Linguistic Comparison Between English Writing and Chinese Writing: EE and CC; 5.1.1 Affect; 5.1.1.1 Authorial-Affect; 5.1.2 Appreciation; 5.1.3 Judgement; 5.1.4 Summary of the Cross-Linguistic Comparison; 5.2 A Cross-Cultural Comparison Between EE and CEE; 5.2.1 Affect; 5.2.1.1 Authorial-Affect; 5.2.2 Appreciation
5.2.3 Judgment5.2.4 Summary of the Cross-Cultural Comparison; 5.3 A Within-Language Comparison Between CC and CEC; 5.3.1 Attitude; 5.3.2 Affect; 5.3.2.1 Authorial-Affect; 5.3.3 Appreciation; 5.3.4 Judgement; 5.3.5 Summary of the Within-Language Comparison; 5.4 A Within-Subject Comparison Between CEE and CEC; 5.4.1 Attitude; 5.4.2 Affect; 5.4.2.1 Authorial-Affect; 5.4.3 Appreciation; 5.4.4 Judgement; 5.4.5 Summary of the Within-Subject Comparison; 5.5 Summary; 6 Conclusions and Implications; Appendix A: Number of Chinese Characters and Words after Parsing in CEC and CC
Appendix B: Occurrences of Attitude Realisations in EEAppendix C: Occurrences of Attitude Realisations in CC; Appendix D: Occurrences of Attitude Realisations in CEE; Appendix E: Occurrences of Attitude Realisations in CEC; References