Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Intro; Preface; Contents; List of Cases and Opinions; Canada; Denmark; Finland; Court of Justice of the European Union; European Court of Human Rights; United Nations Human Rights Committee; 1 Introduction; References; 2 Construction of Two Enumerations; 2.1 Constitutional Basis; 2.2 Legislative History Behind Two Lists of Enumerations; References; 3 Material Content of Enumerations; 3.1 Canada and the Provinces: A Mix of Law-Making Powers for Both Orders of Government; 3.2 Finland and the Åland Islands: Competence Mainly in Public Law
3.3 Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Sub-state Entity in Charge of Its Own Competence3.4 Limited or No Existence of Concurrent Powers; 3.5 Lack of Federal or National Supremacy; References; 4 Management of Competence Claims; 4.1 Bodies of Dispute Resolution; 4.1.1 Canada: Symmetrical but Unsystematic Competence Control; 4.1.2 Finland: Asymmetrical but Systematic Competence Control; 4.1.3 Denmark: Unilateral but Inactive Competence Control; 4.1.4 Concluding Remarks; 4.2 Methods of Managing the Distribution of Competence
4.2.1 Canada and the Provinces: Interpretations to Enhance Cooperative Federalism4.2.2 Finland and the Åland Islands: Watertight Compartments with Some Modifications; 4.2.3 Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Political Determination Leading to Uncertainty over Competence; 4.2.4 Concluding Remarks; References; 5 Resolution of Competence Claims Concerning Legislative Matters not Mentioned in Enumerations; References; 6 Excursus: The European Union; References; 7 Concluding Remarks
3.3 Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Sub-state Entity in Charge of Its Own Competence3.4 Limited or No Existence of Concurrent Powers; 3.5 Lack of Federal or National Supremacy; References; 4 Management of Competence Claims; 4.1 Bodies of Dispute Resolution; 4.1.1 Canada: Symmetrical but Unsystematic Competence Control; 4.1.2 Finland: Asymmetrical but Systematic Competence Control; 4.1.3 Denmark: Unilateral but Inactive Competence Control; 4.1.4 Concluding Remarks; 4.2 Methods of Managing the Distribution of Competence
4.2.1 Canada and the Provinces: Interpretations to Enhance Cooperative Federalism4.2.2 Finland and the Åland Islands: Watertight Compartments with Some Modifications; 4.2.3 Denmark and the Faroe Islands: Political Determination Leading to Uncertainty over Competence; 4.2.4 Concluding Remarks; References; 5 Resolution of Competence Claims Concerning Legislative Matters not Mentioned in Enumerations; References; 6 Excursus: The European Union; References; 7 Concluding Remarks