000839612 000__ 05032cam\a2200493Ma\4500
000839612 001__ 839612
000839612 005__ 20230306144738.0
000839612 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000839612 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
000839612 008__ 180604s2018\\\\sz\\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000839612 019__ $$a1039066868
000839612 020__ $$a9783319780153$$q(electronic book)
000839612 020__ $$a3319780158$$q(electronic book)
000839612 020__ $$z331978014X
000839612 020__ $$z9783319780146
000839612 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)on1038478575
000839612 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1038478575$$z(OCoLC)1039066868
000839612 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$cYDX$$dN$T$$dEBLCP$$dAZU$$dUAB$$dOCLCQ
000839612 049__ $$aISEA
000839612 050_4 $$aKZ7312
000839612 08204 $$a345.01$$223
000839612 1001_ $$aBabaian, Sarah.
000839612 24510 $$aInternational Criminal Court - an international criminal world court? :$$bjurisdiction and cooperation mechanisms of the Rome statute and its practical implementation /$$cSarah  Babaian.
000839612 260__ $$aCham, Switzerland :$$bSpringer,$$c2018.
000839612 300__ $$a1 online resource.
000839612 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000839612 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000839612 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000839612 5050_ $$aIntro; Preface; Contents; Chapter 1: Introduction; References; Chapter 2: Historical Excursus; References; Chapter 3: Intention and Structure of the ICC; I. Intention; II. Structure; References; Chapter 4: The International Criminal Court: A Criminal World Court?; I. Judicial Pillar; 1. Article 12 (2) (a) Rome Statute; a. Main Objections and Possible Violation of Article 34 VCLT; b. Interim Result; 2. Article 13 (b) Rome Statute; a. Applicability of the Rome Statutes Provisions; (1) Strict Approach; (2) Strict/Customary International Law Approach
000839612 5058_ $$a(3) Non-State-Member as an Analogous Party Approach(4) Analysis and Discussion; b. Interim Result; 3. Article 15 bis, 15 ter, Article 16, Article 17 et seq., Article 27 and Article 124 Rome Statute; a. Article 15 bis and 15 ter Rome Statute; (1) Exercise of Jurisdiction with Regard to the Crime of Aggression; (2) Interim Result; b. Article 16 Rome Statute; c. Articles 17, 18, 19 Rome Statute; d. Article 27 Rome Statute; e. Article 124 Rome Statute; f. Interim Result; II. Enforcement Pillar; 1. International Cooperation and Judicial Assistance in Theory; a. General Provisions Under Part 9
000839612 5058_ $$aArticles 86, 87 and 88 Rome Statuteb. Arrest and Surrender Articles 89-92 Rome Statute; c. Other Forms of Cooperation Articles 93, 94, 96 and 99 Rome Statute; d. General Provisions Under Part 9; Articles 95, 97 and 98 Rome Statute; (1) Article 95 Rome Statute; (2) Article 97 Rome Statute; (3) Article 98 Rome Statute; (i) Article 98 (1) and its Relationship to Article 27 (2) in Conjunction with Article 12 (1) Rome Statute; (ii) Article 98 (1) and Its Relationship to Article 27 (2) in Conjunction with Article 12 (2) (a) Rome Statute
000839612 5058_ $$a(Iii) Article 98 (1) and Its Relationship to Article 27 (2) in Conjunction with Article 13 (b)(iv) Article 98 (2); e. Interim Result; 2. International Cooperation and Judicial Assistance in Practice; a. States Cooperation Regarding Self-referrals and Prosecutorś proprio muto Investigations; b. States Cooperation Regarding UN Security Council Referrals; c. Interim Result; 3. Possible Solutions; References; Chapter 5: Conclusion; References; Bibliography
000839612 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000839612 520__ $$aThis book provides an analysis of whether the International Criminal Court can be regarded as an International Criminal World Court, capable of exercising its jurisdiction upon every individual despite the fact that not every State is a Party to the Rome Statute. The analysis is based on a twin-pillar system, which consists of a judicial and an enforcement pillar. The judicial pillar is based on the most disputed articles of the Rome Statute; its goal is to determine the potential scope of the Court’s strength through the application of its jurisdiction regime. The enforcement pillar provides an analysis of the cooperation and judicial assistance mechanism pursuant to the Rome Statute’s provisions and its practical implementation through States’ practices. The results of the analysis, and the lack of an effective enforcement mechanism, demonstrate that the ICC cannot in fact be considered a criminal world court. In conclusion, possible solutions are presented in order to improve the enforcement pillar of the Court so that the tremendous strength of the ICC’s judicial pillar, and with it, the exercise of worldwide jurisdiction, can be effectively implemented.
000839612 61020 $$aInternational Criminal Court.
000839612 63000 $$aRome Statute of the International Criminal Court$$d(1998 July 17)
000839612 650_0 $$aInternational criminal courts.
000839612 650_0 $$aJurisprudence.
000839612 650_0 $$aCriminal justice, Administration of.
000839612 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z331978014X$$z9783319780146$$w(OCoLC)1023525899
000839612 852__ $$bebk
000839612 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-78015-3$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000839612 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:839612$$pGLOBAL_SET
000839612 980__ $$aEBOOK
000839612 980__ $$aBIB
000839612 982__ $$aEbook
000839612 983__ $$aOnline
000839612 994__ $$a92$$bISE