000840012 000__ 03301cam\a2200409\a\4500
000840012 001__ 840012
000840012 005__ 20210515151508.0
000840012 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000840012 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000840012 008__ 101104s2011\\\\enk\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000840012 010__ $$z  2010045606
000840012 020__ $$z9780521196994
000840012 020__ $$z9781139080132$$q(electronic book)
000840012 035__ $$a(MiAaPQ)EBC691896
000840012 035__ $$a(Au-PeEL)EBL691896
000840012 035__ $$a(CaPaEBR)ebr10476472
000840012 035__ $$a(CaONFJC)MIL312725
000840012 035__ $$a(OCoLC)735593942
000840012 040__ $$aMiAaPQ$$cMiAaPQ$$dMiAaPQ
000840012 050_4 $$aK4448$$b.W35 2011
000840012 1001_ $$aWaibel, Michael,$$cLL. M.
000840012 24510 $$aSovereign defaults before International courts and tribunals$$h[electronic resource] /$$cMichael Waibel.
000840012 260__ $$aCambridge ;$$aNew York :$$bCambridge University Press,$$c2011.
000840012 300__ $$alvi, 366 p.
000840012 4901_ $$aCambridge studies in international and comparative law
000840012 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000840012 5058_ $$aMachine generated contents note: 1. Sovereign debt crises and defaults; 2. Political responses to sovereign defaults; 3. Quasi-receivership of highly indebted countries; 4. Monetary reform and sovereign debt; 5. Financial necessity; 6. National settlement institutions; 7. Arbitration on sovereign debt; 8. Arbitration clauses in sovereign debt instruments; 9. Creditor protection in international law; 10. ICSID arbitration on sovereign debt; 11. Overlapping jurisdiction over sovereign debt; 12. Sovereign default as trigger of responsibility; 13. Compensation on sovereign debt; 14. Building durable institutions for adjudicating sovereign defaults.
000840012 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000840012 520__ $$a"International law on sovereign defaults is underdeveloped because States have largely refrained from adjudicating disputes arising out of public debt. The looming new wave of sovereign defaults is likely to shift dispute resolution away from national courts to international tribunals and transform the current regime for restructuring sovereign debt. Michael Waibel assesses how international tribunals balance creditor claims and sovereign capacity to pay across time. The history of adjudicating sovereign defaults internationally over the last 150 years offers a rich repository of experience for future cases: US state defaults, quasi-receiverships in the Dominican Republic and Ottoman Empire, the Venezuela Preferential Case, the Soviet repudiation in 1917, the League of Nations, the World War Foreign Debt Commission, Germany's 30-year restructuring after 1918 and ICSID arbitration on Argentina's default in 2001. The remarkable continuity in international practice and jurisprudence suggests avenues for building durable institutions capable of resolving future sovereign defaults"--$$cProvided by publisher.
000840012 650_0 $$aDebts, Public$$xLaw and legislation.
000840012 650_0 $$aDebts, External$$xLaw and legislation.
000840012 650_0 $$aArbitration (International law)
000840012 650_0 $$aInternational courts.
000840012 830_0 $$aCambridge studies in international and comparative law.
000840012 852__ $$bebk
000840012 85640 $$3ProQuest Ebook Central Academic Complete$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/usiricelib-ebooks/detail.action?docID=691896$$zOnline Access
000840012 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:840012$$pGLOBAL_SET
000840012 980__ $$aEBOOK
000840012 980__ $$aBIB
000840012 982__ $$aEbook
000840012 983__ $$aOnline