000840179 000__ 02718cam\a2200373\a\4500
000840179 001__ 840179
000840179 005__ 20210515151530.0
000840179 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000840179 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000840179 008__ 110322s2011\\\\enk\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000840179 010__ $$z  2011012264
000840179 020__ $$z9780521197601
000840179 020__ $$z9781139099530$$q(electronic book)
000840179 035__ $$a(MiAaPQ)EBC803083
000840179 035__ $$a(Au-PeEL)EBL803083
000840179 035__ $$a(CaPaEBR)ebr10502815
000840179 035__ $$a(OCoLC)769342118
000840179 040__ $$aMiAaPQ$$cMiAaPQ$$dMiAaPQ
000840179 050_4 $$aK3240$$b.D39 2011
000840179 08204 $$a344.7305/3250269$$222
000840179 1001_ $$aDe Londras, Fiona.
000840179 24510 $$aDetention in the 'War on Terror'$$h[electronic resource] :$$bcan human rights fight back? /$$cFiona de Londras.
000840179 260__ $$aCambridge ;$$aNew York :$$bCambridge University Press,$$c2011.
000840179 300__ $$ax, 316 p.
000840179 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000840179 5058_ $$aMachine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Panic, fear and counter-terrorist law-making; 2. The right to be free from arbitrary detention; 3. Counter-terrorist detention: the executive approach; 4. Legislating for counter-terrorist detention; 5. International human rights law's resilience in the face of panic; 6. Judicial responses to counter-terrorist detention: rights-based resistance?; 7. Conclusion.
000840179 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000840179 520__ $$a"Fiona de Londras presents an overview of counter-terrorist detention in the US and the UK and the attempts by both states to achieve a downward recalibration of international human rights standards as they apply in an emergency. Arguing that the design and implementation of this policy has been greatly influenced by both popular and manufactured panic, Detention in the 'War on Terror' addresses counter-terrorist detention through an original analytic framework. In contrast to domestic law in the US and UK, de Londras argues that international human rights law has generally resisted the challenge to the right to be free from arbitrary detention, largely because of its relative insulation from counter-terrorist panic. She argues that this resilience gradually emboldened superior courts in the US and UK to resist repressive detention laws and policies and insist upon greater rights-protection for suspected terrorists"--$$cProvided by publisher.
000840179 650_0 $$aHuman rights$$xInternational cooperation.
000840179 650_0 $$aDetention of persons.
000840179 650_0 $$aTerrorism$$xPrevention$$xLaw and legislation.
000840179 852__ $$bebk
000840179 85640 $$3ProQuest Ebook Central Academic Complete$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/usiricelib-ebooks/detail.action?docID=803083$$zOnline Access
000840179 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:840179$$pGLOBAL_SET
000840179 980__ $$aEBOOK
000840179 980__ $$aBIB
000840179 982__ $$aEbook
000840179 983__ $$aOnline