000841111 000__ 02586cam\a2200397\a\4500
000841111 001__ 841111
000841111 005__ 20210515151755.0
000841111 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000841111 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000841111 008__ 120522s2013\\\\enk\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000841111 010__ $$z  2012021094
000841111 020__ $$z9781107024847
000841111 020__ $$z9781139845076$$q(electronic book)
000841111 035__ $$a(MiAaPQ)EBC1057526
000841111 035__ $$a(Au-PeEL)EBL1057526
000841111 035__ $$a(CaPaEBR)ebr10628061
000841111 035__ $$a(CaONFJC)MIL414877
000841111 035__ $$a(OCoLC)818659219
000841111 040__ $$aMiAaPQ$$cMiAaPQ$$dMiAaPQ
000841111 050_4 $$aJA71$$b.C575 2013
000841111 08204 $$a320.01$$223
000841111 24500 $$aAgainst autonomy$$h[electronic resource] :$$bjustifying coercive paternalism /$$cby Sarah Conly.
000841111 260__ $$aCambridge :$$bCambridge University Press,$$c2013.
000841111 300__ $$aviii, 206 p.
000841111 5058_ $$aMachine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Why value autonomy?; 2. Individuality; 3. Alienation, authenticity, and affect; 4. Misuse and abuse: perfectionism and preferences; 5. Misuse and abuse: punishment and privacy; 6. Applications; 7. Final justifications.
000841111 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000841111 520__ $$a"Since Mill's seminal work On Liberty, philosophers and political theorists have accepted that we should respect the decisions of individual agents when those decisions affect no one other than themselves. Indeed, to respect autonomy is often understood to be the chief way to bear witness to the intrinsic value of persons. In this book, Sarah Conly rejects the idea of autonomy as inviolable. Drawing on sources from behavioural economics and social psychology, she argues that we are so often irrational in making our decisions that our autonomous choices often undercut the achievement of our own goals. Thus in many cases it would advance our goals more effectively if government were to prevent us from acting in accordance with our decisions. Her argument challenges widely held views of moral agency, democratic values and the public/private distinction, and will interest readers in ethics, political philosophy, political theory and philosophy of law"--$$cProvided by publisher.
000841111 650_0 $$aDecision making$$xPolitical aspects.
000841111 650_0 $$aDecision making$$xPhilosophy.
000841111 650_0 $$aPaternalism.
000841111 650_0 $$aAutonomy (Philosophy)
000841111 650_0 $$aChoice (Psychology)
000841111 7001_ $$aConly, Sarah.
000841111 852__ $$bebk
000841111 85640 $$3ProQuest Ebook Central Academic Complete$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/usiricelib-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1057526$$zOnline Access
000841111 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:841111$$pGLOBAL_SET
000841111 980__ $$aEBOOK
000841111 980__ $$aBIB
000841111 982__ $$aEbook
000841111 983__ $$aOnline