000868475 000__ 03773cam\a2200445Ii\4500
000868475 001__ 868475
000868475 005__ 20230306145859.0
000868475 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000868475 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000868475 008__ 190503s2019\\\\sz\a\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d
000868475 020__ $$a9783030125202$$q(electronic book)
000868475 020__ $$a3030125203$$q(electronic book)
000868475 020__ $$z9783030125196
000868475 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2$$2doi
000868475 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)on1099790437
000868475 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1099790437
000868475 040__ $$aGW5XE$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cGW5XE$$dDKU
000868475 049__ $$aISEA
000868475 050_4 $$aK5471
000868475 08204 $$a347/.062$$223
000868475 24500 $$aDo exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? :$$ba comparative perspective on evidentiary rules /$$cSabine Gless, Thomas Richter, editors.
000868475 264_1 $$aCham, Switzerland :$$bSpringer Open,$$c2019.
000868475 300__ $$a1 online resource (xv, 380 pages) :$$billustrations
000868475 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000868475 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000868475 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000868475 4901_ $$aIus Gentium,$$x1534-6781 ;$$vvolume 74
000868475 50500 $$gPart I:$$tComparative perspectives:$$tThe potential to secure a fair trial through evidence exclusion : a Swiss perspective /$$rLaura Macula --$$tThe potential to secure a fair trial through evidence exclusion : a German perspective /$$rThomas Weigend --$$tRegulating interrogations and excluding confessions in the United States : balancing individual rights and the search for the truth /$$rJenia Iontcheva Turner --$$tThe potential to secure a fair trial through evidence exclusion : a Taiwanese perspective /$$rYu-Hsiung Lin, Shih-Fan Wang, Chung-Yen Chen, Tsai-Chen Tsai, Chiou-Ming Tsai --$$tThe potential to secure a fair trial through evidence exclusion : a Chinese perspective /$$rNa Jiang --$$tCriminal justice and the exclusion of incriminating statements in Singapore /$$rHock Lai Ho.
000868475 50580 $$gPart II:$$tExclusionary rules : Quo Vadis:$$tThe purposes and functions of exclusionary rules : a comparative overview /$$rJenai Iontcheva Turner, Thomas Weigend --$$tThe fair trial rationale for excluding wrongfully obtained evidence /$$rHock Lai Ho --$$tExclusionary rule of illegal evidence in Chian : observations from historical and empirical perspectives /$$rWeimin Zuo, Rongjie Lan --$$tSecuring a fair trial through exclusionary rules : do theory and practice form a well-balanced whole? /$$rSusanne Knickmeier --$$tExclusionary rules : is it time for change? /$$rSabine Gless, Laura Macula.
000868475 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000868475 520__ $$aThis open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved. --$$cProvided by publisher.
000868475 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed May 3, 2019).
000868475 650_0 $$aExclusionary rule (Evidence)
000868475 7001_ $$aGless, Sabine,$$eeditor.
000868475 7001_ $$aRichter, Thomas,$$eeditor.
000868475 830_0 $$aIus gentium (Dordrecht, Netherlands) ;$$vv. 74.
000868475 852__ $$bebk
000868475 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000868475 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:868475$$pGLOBAL_SET
000868475 980__ $$aEBOOK
000868475 980__ $$aBIB
000868475 982__ $$aEbook
000868475 983__ $$aOnline
000868475 994__ $$a92$$bISE