Opting for the best : oughts and options / Douglas W. Portmore.
2019
BJ1595 .P835 2019
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Details
Title
Opting for the best : oughts and options / Douglas W. Portmore.
ISBN
9780190945381 (electronic book)
Published
New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2019.
Language
English
Description
1 online resource.
Call Number
BJ1595 .P835 2019
Dewey Decimal Classification
170.42
Summary
This text concerns what is, perhaps, the least controversial normative principle concerning action: you ought to perform your best option-best, that is, in terms of whatever ultimately matters. The text sets aside the question of what ultimately matters so as to focus on the following questions. What are our options? Which options do we assess directly in terms of their own goodness and which do we assess in terms of the goodness of the more encompassing options of which they're a proper part? What do we hold fixed when assessing how good an option is? Do we, for instance, hold fixed the agent's present beliefs, desires, and intentions? And do we hold fixed the agent's predictable future misbehaviour?
Note
Also issued in print: 2019.
This text concerns what is, perhaps, the least controversial normative principle concerning action: you ought to perform your best option-best, that is, in terms of whatever ultimately matters. The text sets aside the question of what ultimately matters so as to focus on the following questions. What are our options? Which options do we assess directly in terms of their own goodness and which do we assess in terms of the goodness of the more encompassing options of which they're a proper part? What do we hold fixed when assessing how good an option is? Do we, for instance, hold fixed the agent's present beliefs, desires, and intentions? And do we hold fixed the agent's predictable future misbehaviour?
This text concerns what is, perhaps, the least controversial normative principle concerning action: you ought to perform your best option-best, that is, in terms of whatever ultimately matters. The text sets aside the question of what ultimately matters so as to focus on the following questions. What are our options? Which options do we assess directly in terms of their own goodness and which do we assess in terms of the goodness of the more encompassing options of which they're a proper part? What do we hold fixed when assessing how good an option is? Do we, for instance, hold fixed the agent's present beliefs, desires, and intentions? And do we hold fixed the agent's predictable future misbehaviour?
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Source of Description
Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on June 13, 2019).
Series
Oxford moral theory.
Oxford scholarship online.
Oxford scholarship online.
Available in Other Form
Print version: 9780190945350
Linked Resources
Record Appears in