Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Intro; Acknowledgements; Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; Introduction: 'I Committed Scientific Fraud, I Changed and Invented Research Data'; 1 Why Should Criminology Study Research Misconduct?; 1.1 The Relevance of Criminology; 1.2 Criminological Studies of Research Misconduct; 1.3 Research Misconduct as White-Collar Crime; 1.4 Applying White-Collar Crime Scholarship to Research Misconduct; References; 2 What Is Research Misconduct?; 2.1 A Place for Everything and Everything in Its Place; 2.2 What Exactly Is Known About Research Misconduct?; Research Misconduct in Numbers
Features of the Researcher and the Research EnvironmentRegulating, Detecting, and Sanctioning Research Misconduct; Prevention of Research Misconduct and Promotion of Integrity; Harms and Costs; 2.3 Research Misconduct: Looking into the Shattered Glass; References; 3 Good Luck with the Research That Will End Your Career; 3.1 Using Qualitative Methods and Assessing Their Quality; 3.2 Interviewing Scholars on Research Misconduct; 3.3 Analysing Documents on Research Misconduct; The Corpus; 3.4 Analysis of Interviews and Documents; 3.5 Challenges in Researching Research Misconduct
Researching the Elites and the Powerful3.6 Researching Your Peers and How It Changes You; References; 4 What Do Researchers Know and Perceive About Research Misconduct?; 4.1 Authorship Practices: 'The Hunger for Publications' (S16); 4.2 Problematic Methodological Procedures: 'We All Want Our Data to Look Just as Good as Possible' (S2); 4.3 Bias in Peer Assessment-'There's the One That Glows ... and Some Are Pushed to the Corner' (S13); 4.4 Relations with External Actors: 'If You Bring Money You Have the Freedom to Decide on Everything' (S8); Interference; Influence; Ambivalence
4.5 Science Under Pressure: Recognition and Funding4.6 Convergence Mechanisms for Recognition and Funding Goals; Pressure; Social Control; Lack of Alternatives and Scarce Resources; Individual Reaction Strategies; References; 5 Preventing, Regulating, and Punishing Research Misconduct: Myth or Reality?; 5.1 Scholars' Perception of Social Control of Research Misconduct; 5.2 European Scientific Policies for Controlling Research Misconduct; Definitions of Research Misconduct; Evidence-Based Knowledge About Research Misconduct; Actors Involved in Controlling Research
Proposed Models of Control for Research MisconductJustifications Used for Proposed Control Models for Research Misconduct; 5.3 Globalization Versus Harmonization; 5.4 Self-Regulation Versus Hetero-regulation; 5.5 Testing Hypotheses in a Largely Qualitative Study; 5.6 A Synthesis of Results; References; 6 A Criminological Agenda for Studying Research Misconduct; 6.1 A Brief (and Unfair) Account of What Science Is; 6.2 Questions Unanswered-Or a Future Research Agenda; 6.3 The Path Behind and the Road Ahead; References; Conclusions; References; Index
Features of the Researcher and the Research EnvironmentRegulating, Detecting, and Sanctioning Research Misconduct; Prevention of Research Misconduct and Promotion of Integrity; Harms and Costs; 2.3 Research Misconduct: Looking into the Shattered Glass; References; 3 Good Luck with the Research That Will End Your Career; 3.1 Using Qualitative Methods and Assessing Their Quality; 3.2 Interviewing Scholars on Research Misconduct; 3.3 Analysing Documents on Research Misconduct; The Corpus; 3.4 Analysis of Interviews and Documents; 3.5 Challenges in Researching Research Misconduct
Researching the Elites and the Powerful3.6 Researching Your Peers and How It Changes You; References; 4 What Do Researchers Know and Perceive About Research Misconduct?; 4.1 Authorship Practices: 'The Hunger for Publications' (S16); 4.2 Problematic Methodological Procedures: 'We All Want Our Data to Look Just as Good as Possible' (S2); 4.3 Bias in Peer Assessment-'There's the One That Glows ... and Some Are Pushed to the Corner' (S13); 4.4 Relations with External Actors: 'If You Bring Money You Have the Freedom to Decide on Everything' (S8); Interference; Influence; Ambivalence
4.5 Science Under Pressure: Recognition and Funding4.6 Convergence Mechanisms for Recognition and Funding Goals; Pressure; Social Control; Lack of Alternatives and Scarce Resources; Individual Reaction Strategies; References; 5 Preventing, Regulating, and Punishing Research Misconduct: Myth or Reality?; 5.1 Scholars' Perception of Social Control of Research Misconduct; 5.2 European Scientific Policies for Controlling Research Misconduct; Definitions of Research Misconduct; Evidence-Based Knowledge About Research Misconduct; Actors Involved in Controlling Research
Proposed Models of Control for Research MisconductJustifications Used for Proposed Control Models for Research Misconduct; 5.3 Globalization Versus Harmonization; 5.4 Self-Regulation Versus Hetero-regulation; 5.5 Testing Hypotheses in a Largely Qualitative Study; 5.6 A Synthesis of Results; References; 6 A Criminological Agenda for Studying Research Misconduct; 6.1 A Brief (and Unfair) Account of What Science Is; 6.2 Questions Unanswered-Or a Future Research Agenda; 6.3 The Path Behind and the Road Ahead; References; Conclusions; References; Index