000909157 000__ 03146cam\a2200397\a\4500
000909157 001__ 909157
000909157 005__ 20210515182756.0
000909157 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000909157 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000909157 008__ 120607s2013\\\\enka\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000909157 010__ $$z  2012023434
000909157 020__ $$z9780415609852 
000909157 020__ $$z9780203077481 $$q(electronic book)
000909157 035__ $$a(MiAaPQ)EBC1101430
000909157 035__ $$a(Au-PeEL)EBL1101430
000909157 035__ $$a(CaPaEBR)ebr10640560
000909157 035__ $$a(CaONFJC)MIL420703
000909157 035__ $$a(OCoLC)823389787
000909157 040__ $$aMiAaPQ$$cMiAaPQ$$dMiAaPQ
000909157 050_4 $$aKZ6374$$b.G75 2013
000909157 08204 $$a341.5/8$$223
000909157 1001_ $$aGrimal, Francis.
000909157 24510 $$aThreats of force$$h[electronic resource] :$$binternational law and strategy /$$cFrancis Grimal.
000909157 260__ $$aLondon ;$$aNew York :$$bRoutledge,$$c2013.
000909157 300__ $$axvi, 216 p. :$$bill.
000909157 440_0 $$aRoutledge research in international law
000909157 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000909157 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000909157 520__ $$a"Despite recent attempts by scholars to examine the absolute prohibition of threats of force under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, threats remain a largely un-chartered area in international law when compared with actual uses of force. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach and drawing on the works of strategic literature and international relations theory, this book examines the theoretical nature behind a threat of force in order to inform and explain why and how the normative structure operates in the way it does. The core of the book addresses whether Article 2(4) is adequately suited to the current international climate and, if not, whether an alternative means of rethinking Article 2(4) would provide a better solution. Francis Grimal also addresses two other fundamental issues within the realm of threats of force that remain largely unexplored in present literature. Firstly, the interrelationship between threats of force and self-defence, would a state have to suffer an armed attack before threatening force in self-defence or could it threaten force pre-emptively? Can a state lawfully use a threat of force as a means of self-defence rather than force under the present Charter system? Finally, the book explores the point at which a state pursuing nuclear capabilities may breach Article 2(4) with particular reference to both North Korean and Iranian efforts to pursue nuclear technology.This topical book will be of great interest not only to scholars and postgraduates in international law but also to academics and students across several fields due to its interdisciplinary approach including strategic studies and international relations theories."--$$cProvided by publisher.
000909157 61020 $$aUnited Nations.$$tCharter.
000909157 650_0 $$aUltimatums (International relations)
000909157 650_0 $$aAggression (International law)
000909157 650_0 $$aPacific settlement of international disputes.
000909157 852__ $$bebk
000909157 85640 $$3ProQuest Ebook Central Academic Complete$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/usiricelib-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1101430$$zOnline Access
000909157 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:909157$$pGLOBAL_SET
000909157 980__ $$aEBOOK
000909157 980__ $$aBIB
000909157 982__ $$aEbook
000909157 983__ $$aOnline