000910286 000__ 03196cam\a2200445\a\4500
000910286 001__ 910286
000910286 005__ 20210515183059.0
000910286 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000910286 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000910286 008__ 121003s2013\\\\enk\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000910286 010__ $$z  2012040416
000910286 020__ $$z9780521191616 
000910286 020__ $$z9781107057371 $$q(electronic book)
000910286 035__ $$a(MiAaPQ)EBC1182918
000910286 035__ $$a(Au-PeEL)EBL1182918
000910286 035__ $$a(CaPaEBR)ebr10695285
000910286 035__ $$a(CaONFJC)MIL494683
000910286 035__ $$a(OCoLC)833300205
000910286 040__ $$aMiAaPQ$$cMiAaPQ$$dMiAaPQ
000910286 050_4 $$aZ711.92.H3$$bV37 2013
000910286 08204 $$a004.087$$223
000910286 1001_ $$aVarney, Eliza,$$d1978-
000910286 24510 $$aDisability and information technology$$h[electronic resource] :$$ba comparative study in media regulation /$$cEliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.
000910286 260__ $$aCambridge :$$bCambridge University Press,$$c2013.
000910286 300__ $$axxiii, 288 p.
000910286 4901_ $$aCambridge disability law and policy series
000910286 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 263-282) and index.
000910286 5058_ $$aMachine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies.
000910286 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000910286 520__ $$a"Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities"--$$cProvided by publisher.
000910286 650_0 $$aPeople with disabilities$$xInformation techology$$vCase studies.
000910286 650_0 $$aPeople with disabilities$$xServices for$$xData processing$$vCase studies.
000910286 650_0 $$aComputers and people with disabilities$$vCase studies.
000910286 650_0 $$aPeople with disabilities$$xLegal status, laws, etc.$$vCase studies.
000910286 650_0 $$aMass Media$$xLaw and legislation$$vCase studies.
000910286 650_0 $$aLibraries and people with disabilities$$vCase studies.
000910286 830_0 $$aCambridge disability, law and policy series.
000910286 852__ $$bebk
000910286 85640 $$3ProQuest Ebook Central Academic Complete$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/usiricelib-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1182918$$zOnline Access
000910286 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:910286$$pGLOBAL_SET
000910286 980__ $$aEBOOK
000910286 980__ $$aBIB
000910286 982__ $$aEbook
000910286 983__ $$aOnline