000916113 000__ 03591cam\a2200469Ia\4500 000916113 001__ 916113 000916113 005__ 20230306150524.0 000916113 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\ 000916113 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun 000916113 008__ 191030s2019\\\\sz\\\\\\o\\\\\000\0\eng\d 000916113 019__ $$a1125972153$$a1125989857$$a1126616543 000916113 020__ $$a9783030204471$$q(electronic book) 000916113 020__ $$a3030204472$$q(electronic book) 000916113 020__ $$z3030204464 000916113 020__ $$z9783030204464 000916113 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-20 000916113 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)on1125356209 000916113 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1125356209$$z(OCoLC)1125972153$$z(OCoLC)1125989857$$z(OCoLC)1126616543 000916113 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$cYDX$$dGW5XE$$dEBLCP$$dLQU$$dN$T 000916113 049__ $$aISEA 000916113 050_4 $$aQA9.54 000916113 08204 $$a511.3/6$$223 000916113 24500 $$aMathesis universalis, computability and proof /$$cStefania Centrone, Sara Negri, Deniz Sarikaya, Peter M. Schuster, editors. 000916113 260__ $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c2019. 000916113 300__ $$a1 online resource 000916113 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent 000916113 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia 000916113 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier 000916113 4901_ $$aSynthese library ;$$vv. 412 000916113 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users. 000916113 520__ $$aIn a fragment entitled Elementa Nova Matheseos Universalis (1683?) Leibniz writes "the mathesis [...] shall deliver the method through which things that are conceivable can be exactly determined"; in another fragment he takes the mathesis to be "the science of all things that are conceivable." Leibniz considers all mathematical disciplines as branches of the mathesis and conceives the mathesis as a general science of forms applicable not only to magnitudes but to every object that exists in our imagination, i.e. that is possible at least in principle. As a general science of forms the mathesis investigates possible relations between "arbitrary objects" ("objets quelconques"). It is an abstract theory of combinations and relations among objects whatsoever. In 1810 the mathematician and philosopher Bernard Bolzano published a booklet entitled Contributions to a Better-Grounded Presentation of Mathematics. There is, according to him, a certain objective connection among the truths that are germane to a certain homogeneous field of objects: some truths are the "reasons" ("GrĂ¼nde") of others, and the latter are "consequences" ("Folgen") of the former. The reason-consequence relation seems to be the counterpart of causality at the level of a relation between true propositions. A rigorous proof is characterized in this context as a proof that shows the reason of the proposition that is to be proven. Requirements imposed on rigorous proofs seem to anticipate normalization results in current proof theory. The contributors of Mathesis Universalis, Computability and Proof, leading experts in the fields of computer science, mathematics, logic and philosophy, show the evolution of these and related ideas exploring topics in proof theory, computability theory, intuitionistic logic, constructivism and reverse mathematics, delving deeply into a contextual examination of the relationship between mathematical rigor and demands for simplification. 000916113 650_0 $$aProof theory. 000916113 7001_ $$aCentrone, Stefania. 000916113 7001_ $$aNegri, Sara,$$d1967- 000916113 7001_ $$aSarikaya, Deniz. 000916113 7001_ $$aSchuster, Peter M. 000916113 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z3030204464$$z9783030204464$$w(OCoLC)1097303580 000916113 830_0 $$aSynthese library ;$$vv. 412. 000916113 852__ $$bebk 000916113 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-20447-1$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1 000916113 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:916113$$pGLOBAL_SET 000916113 980__ $$aEBOOK 000916113 980__ $$aBIB 000916113 982__ $$aEbook 000916113 983__ $$aOnline 000916113 994__ $$a92$$bISE