000916825 000__ 04294cam\a2200397\i\4500
000916825 001__ 916825
000916825 005__ 20210515184924.0
000916825 008__ 190610s2019\\\\ksu\\\\\\b\\\\001\0\eng\\
000916825 010__ $$a  2019007131
000916825 020__ $$a9780700628445$$q(hardcover)
000916825 020__ $$a0700628444$$q(hardcover)
000916825 020__ $$z9780700628452$$q(electronic book)
000916825 035__ $$a(OCoLC)on1096343256
000916825 035__ $$a916825
000916825 040__ $$aDLC$$beng$$erda$$cDLC$$dOCLCF$$dOCLCO$$dUUM$$dYDX$$dMNN
000916825 042__ $$apcc
000916825 043__ $$an-us---
000916825 049__ $$aISEA
000916825 05000 $$aKF5505$$b.S65 2019
000916825 08200 $$a344.7304/6$$223
000916825 1001_ $$aSmith, Kimberly K.,$$d1966-$$eauthor.
000916825 24514 $$aThe conservation constitution :$$bthe conservation movement and constitutional change, 1870-1930 /$$cKimberly K. Smith.
000916825 264_1 $$aLawrence, Kansas :$$bUniversity Press of Kansas$$c[2019]
000916825 300__ $$aviii, 333 pages ;$$c24 cm.
000916825 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000916825 337__ $$aunmediated$$bn$$2rdamedia
000916825 338__ $$avolume$$bnc$$2rdacarrier
000916825 4901_ $$aEnvironment and society
000916825 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000916825 5050_ $$aState wildlife conservation -- The road to Missouri v. Holland -- Forest conservation in the states -- Western forest reserves -- Eastern forest reserves -- Managing federal lands -- State and local pollution control -- Federalizing pollution control -- The conservation movement's constitutional legacy.
000916825 520__ $$a"Over the course of the twentieth century, the United States emerged as a global leader in conservation policy--negotiating the first international conservation treaties, pioneering the idea of the national park, and leading the world in creating a modern environmental regulatory regime. And yet, this is a country famously committed to the ideals of limited government, decentralization, and strong protection of property rights. How these contradictory values have been reconciled, not always successfully, is what Kimberly K. Smith sets out to explain in The Conservation Constitution--a book that brings to light the roots of contemporary constitutional conflict over environmental policy.In the mid-nineteenth century, most Progressive Era conservation policies would have been considered unconstitutional. Smith traces how, between 1870 and 1930, the conservation movement reshaped constitutional doctrine to its purpose--how, specifically, courts and lawyers worked to expand government authority to manage wildlife, forest and water resources, and pollution. Her work, which highlights a number of important Supreme Court decisions often overlooked in accounts of this period, brings the history of environmental management more fully into the story of the US Constitution. At the same time, illuminating the doctrinal innovation in the Progressives' efforts, her book reveals the significance of constitutional history to an understanding of the government's role in environmental management." --$$cProvided by publisher.
000916825 520__ $$a"In The Conservation Constitution, Kim Smith examines how the Progressive Era conservation movement shaped constitutional doctrine. Most Progressive policies aimed at protecting natural resources would have been considered unconstitutional in the mid-nineteenth century. But by 1920, constitutional objections to the new conservation regime had been met and governmental authority to manage natural resources was written into constitutional law. Smith seeks to answer a central question - how did constitutional doctrine evolve to accommodate this expansion of government power over the environment - by exploring the evolution of constitutional doctrine supporting wildlife conservation, forest conservation, and pollution control, from the late nineteenth century through the 1920s. She highlights a string of important Supreme Court decisions usually overlooked in histories of this period, including Geer v. Connecticut, Light v. United States, United States v. Grimaud, Missouri v. Holland, Hunt v. United States, Missouri v. Illinois, and Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co"--$$cProvided by publisher.
000916825 650_0 $$aConservation of natural resources$$xLaw and legislation$$zUnited States$$xHistory.
000916825 650_0 $$aConstitutional history$$zUnited States.
000916825 650_0 $$aProgressivism (United States politics)
000916825 830_0 $$aEnvironment and society.
000916825 85200 $$bgen$$hKF5505$$i.S65$$i2019
000916825 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:916825$$pGLOBAL_SET
000916825 980__ $$aBIB
000916825 980__ $$aBOOK