000924968 000__ 02391cam\a2200397Ii\4500
000924968 001__ 924968
000924968 005__ 20230306151204.0
000924968 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000924968 007__ cr\nn\nnnunnun
000924968 008__ 200128s2020\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000924968 020__ $$a9783030350369$$q(electronic book)
000924968 020__ $$a3030350363$$q(electronic book)
000924968 020__ $$z9783030350352
000924968 0248_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-35
000924968 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)on1137849360
000924968 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1137849360
000924968 040__ $$aLQU$$beng$$cLQU$$dGW5XE$$dEBLCP$$dN$T
000924968 049__ $$aISEA
000924968 050_4 $$aBD111
000924968 08204 $$a190
000924968 1001_ $$aSteinvorth, Ulrich.
000924968 24512 $$aA secular absolute :$$bhow modern philosophy discovered authenticity /$$cUlrich Steinvorth.
000924968 264_1 $$aCham :$$bPalgrave Macmillan,$$c2020.
000924968 300__ $$a1 online resource (xvi, 278 pages)
000924968 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000924968 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000924968 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000924968 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000924968 5050_ $$aChapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Kants Vernünftigkeit -- Chapter 3: Hegels Sittlichkeit -- Chapter 4: Heideggers Eigentlichkeit -- Chapter 5: Reflections.
000924968 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000924968 520__ $$aPremodern societies believed in something sacred that obliged unconditionally. Modern societies rely on fallible science. Do they also need something absolute, a secular sacred? Steinvorth analyzes the writings of modern philosophers who claim that there is an absolute norm: the norm to be rational and authentic. In his view, their claim is true if it is reinterpreted. The norm is not moral, as it was thought to be, but metaphysical, and authenticity is not self-realization, but doing things for their own sake. In discussing the pros and cons of philosophical claims on absolutes, this book spreads out the rich pool of philosophical ideas and clarifies urgent contemporary questions about what can be demanded with universal validity. It argues this is not only the principle of justice, not to harm, but also a metaphysical principle by which to find meaning in life. Moreover, it points to some consequences this principle has in politics.
000924968 650_0 $$aMetaphysics.
000924968 852__ $$bebk
000924968 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-35036-9$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000924968 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:924968$$pGLOBAL_SET
000924968 980__ $$aEBOOK
000924968 980__ $$aBIB
000924968 982__ $$aEbook
000924968 983__ $$aOnline
000924968 994__ $$a92$$bISE