000932713 000__ 03194cam\a2200421Ia\4500 000932713 001__ 932713 000932713 005__ 20230306151621.0 000932713 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\ 000932713 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun 000932713 008__ 200516s2020\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d 000932713 020__ $$a9783030272579$$q(electronic book) 000932713 020__ $$a3030272575$$q(electronic book) 000932713 020__ $$z3030272567 000932713 020__ $$z9783030272562 000932713 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)on1154340086 000932713 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1154340086 000932713 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$cYDX$$dGW5XE$$dN$T$$dOCLCF$$dESU 000932713 049__ $$aISEA 000932713 050_4 $$aHT1521 000932713 08204 $$a305.8$$223 000932713 1001_ $$aUrquidez, Alberto G. 000932713 24510 $$a(Re-)defining racism :$$ba philosophical analysis /$$cAlberto G. Urquidez. 000932713 260__ $$aCham :$$bPalgrave Macmillan,$$cc2020. 000932713 300__ $$a1 online resource 000932713 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent 000932713 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia 000932713 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier 000932713 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 000932713 5050_ $$aCh.1. Introduction: Summary of the Argument -- Ch.2. Introduction: Toward a Conventionalist Framework -- Ch. 3. Re-defining "Definition": An Argument for Conventionalism -- Ch. 4. Re-defining "Meaning": Defending Semantic Internalism Over Externalism -- Ch. 5. Re-defining "Disagreement": Rationality Without Final Solutions -- Ch. 6. Re-defining "Philosophical Analysis": Not Descriptive Analysis, Or Conservatism, But Pragmatic Revisionism -- Ch. 7. Adequacy Conditions for a Prescriptive Theory of Racism: Toward an Oppression-Centered Account -- Ch. 8. Racial Oppression and Grammatical Pluralism: A Critique of Jorge Garcia on Racist belief -- Ch. 9. Concluding Note. 000932713 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users. 000932713 520__ $$aWhat is racism? is a timely question that is hotly contested in the philosophy of race. Yet disagreement about racism's nature does not begin in philosophy, but in the sociopolitical domain. Alberto G. Urquidez argues that philosophers of race have failed to pay sufficient attention to the practical considerations that prompt the question "What is racism?" Most theorists assume that "racism" signifies a language-independent phenomenon that needs to be "discovered" by the relevant science or "uncovered" by close scrutiny of everyday usage of this term. (Re-)Defining Racism challenges this metaphysical paradigm. Urquidez develops a Wittgenstein-inspired framework that illuminates the use of terms like "definition," "meaning," "explanation of meaning," and "disagreement," for the analysis of contested normative concepts. These elucidations reveal that providing a definition of "racism" amounts to recommending a form of moral representation--a rule for the correct use of "racism." As definitional recommendations must be justified on pragmatic grounds, Urquidez takes as a starting point for justification the interests of racism's historical victims. 000932713 650_0 $$aRacism$$xPhilosophy. 000932713 650_0 $$aRacism. 000932713 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z3030272567$$z9783030272562$$w(OCoLC)1107358539 000932713 852__ $$bebk 000932713 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-27257-9$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1 000932713 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:932713$$pGLOBAL_SET 000932713 980__ $$aEBOOK 000932713 980__ $$aBIB 000932713 982__ $$aEbook 000932713 983__ $$aOnline 000932713 994__ $$a92$$bISE