000938408 000__ 03329cam\a2200469Ii\4500
000938408 001__ 938408
000938408 005__ 20230306151808.0
000938408 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000938408 007__ cr\un\nnnunnun
000938408 008__ 200721s2020\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000938408 019__ $$a1175917478$$a1176475175$$a1178998873$$a1182454330$$a1182919144$$a1183935659
000938408 020__ $$a9783030450120$$q(electronic book)
000938408 020__ $$a3030450120$$q(electronic book)
000938408 020__ $$z3030450112
000938408 020__ $$z9783030450113
000938408 0248_ $$a10.1007/978-3-030-45
000938408 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)on1176246694
000938408 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1176246694$$z(OCoLC)1175917478$$z(OCoLC)1176475175$$z(OCoLC)1178998873$$z(OCoLC)1182454330$$z(OCoLC)1182919144$$z(OCoLC)1183935659
000938408 040__ $$aYDX$$beng$$cYDX$$dN$T$$dYDXIT$$dEBLCP$$dLQU$$dGW5XE$$dOCLCF
000938408 049__ $$aISEA
000938408 050_4 $$aBP166.1$$b.M55 2020
000938408 08204 $$a297.2$$223
000938408 1001_ $$aMiller, Larry Benjamin.
000938408 24510 $$aIslamic disputation theory :$$bthe uses & rules of argument in medieval Islam.
000938408 264_1 $$aCham, Switzerland :$$bSpringer,$$c[2020]
000938408 300__ $$a1 online resource
000938408 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000938408 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000938408 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000938408 4901_ $$aLogic, Argumentation and Reasoning ;$$vv.21
000938408 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
000938408 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000938408 520__ $$aThis book charts the evolution of Islamic dialectical theory (jadal) over a four-hundred year period. It includes an extensive study of the development of methods of disputation in Islamic theology (kalām) and jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh) from the tenth through the fourteenth centuries. The author uses the theoretical writings of Islamic theologians, jurists, and philosophers to describe the concept Overall, this investigation looks at the extent to which the development of Islamic modes of disputation is rooted in Aristotle and the classical tradition. The author reconstructs the contents of the earliest systematic treatment of the subject by b. al-Rīwandī. He then contrasts the theological understanding of dialectic with the teachings of the Arab Aristotelians-al-Fārābī, Avicenna, and Averroes. Next, the monograph shows how jurists took over the theological method of dialectic and applied it to problems peculiar to jurisprudence. Although the earliest writings on dialectic are fairly free of direct Aristotelian influence, there are coincidences of themes and treatment. But after jurisprudence had assimilated the techniques of theological dialectic, its own theory became increasingly influenced by logical terminology and techniques. At the end of the thirteenth century there arose a new discipline, the ādāb al-baḥth. While the theoretical underpinnings of the new system are Aristotelian, the terminology and order of debate place it firmly in the Islamic tradition of disputation.
000938408 650_0 $$aIslam$$xTheology$$xHistory.
000938408 650_0 $$aIslam$$xDoctrines$$xHistory.
000938408 650_0 $$aReligious disputations.
000938408 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z3030450112$$z9783030450113$$w(OCoLC)1144110168
000938408 830_0 $$aLogic, argumentation & reasoning ;$$vv. 21.
000938408 852__ $$bebk
000938408 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-45012-0$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000938408 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:938408$$pGLOBAL_SET
000938408 980__ $$aEBOOK
000938408 980__ $$aBIB
000938408 982__ $$aEbook
000938408 983__ $$aOnline
000938408 994__ $$a92$$bISE