000939674 000__ 05557cam\a2200469Ii\4500
000939674 001__ 939674
000939674 005__ 20230306152019.0
000939674 006__ m\\\\\o\\d\\\\\\\\
000939674 007__ cr\cn\nnnunnun
000939674 008__ 180108s2018\\\\sz\\\\\\ob\\\\001\0\eng\d
000939674 019__ $$a1019592801$$a1029640917$$a1058966148$$a1086462299$$a1113147414$$a1122814834$$a1125714761$$a1136456971$$a1144246731$$a1160012104
000939674 020__ $$a9783319685540$$q(electronic book)
000939674 020__ $$a3319685546$$q(electronic book)
000939674 020__ $$z9783319685533
000939674 020__ $$z3319685538
000939674 0247_ $$a10.1007/978-3-319-68554-0$$2doi
000939674 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)on1018307723
000939674 035__ $$aSP(OCoLC)1018307723$$z(OCoLC)1019592801$$z(OCoLC)1029640917$$z(OCoLC)1058966148$$z(OCoLC)1086462299$$z(OCoLC)1113147414$$z(OCoLC)1122814834$$z(OCoLC)1125714761$$z(OCoLC)1136456971$$z(OCoLC)1144246731$$z(OCoLC)1160012104
000939674 040__ $$aN$T$$beng$$erda$$epn$$cN$T$$dN$T$$dEBLCP$$dYDX$$dOCLCF$$dFIE$$dDKU$$dCOO$$dOCLCQ$$dWYU$$dIAD$$dUKMGB$$dIDB$$dUKAHL$$dLEAUB$$dAU@$$dLEATE$$dOCLCQ
000939674 049__ $$aISEA
000939674 050_4 $$aH62
000939674 08204 $$a300.72$$223
000939674 24504 $$aThe evaluation of research in social sciences and humanities :$$blessons from the Italian experience /$$cAndrea Bonaccorsi, editor.
000939674 264_1 $$aCham :$$bSpringer,$$c2018.
000939674 300__ $$a1 online resource
000939674 336__ $$atext$$btxt$$2rdacontent
000939674 337__ $$acomputer$$bc$$2rdamedia
000939674 338__ $$aonline resource$$bcr$$2rdacarrier
000939674 347__ $$atext file$$bPDF$$2rda
000939674 504__ $$aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
000939674 5050_ $$aChapter 1. Introduction: Towards an Epistemic Theory of Evaluation in Social Sciences and Humanities; Andrea Bonaccorsi -- Part I. Research Quality Criteria in SSH -- Chapter 2. Peer Review in Social Sciences and Humanities: Addressing the Interpretation of Quality Criteria; Andrea Bonaccorsi -- Chapter 3. Guidelines for Peer Review: A Survey of International Practices; Andrea Capaccioni and Gianna Spina -- Chapter 4. Individual and Department Level Indicators of Scientific Productivity: A Multisource Analysis; Chiara Faggiolani -- Chapter 5. Research Quality Criteria: The Case of Legal Studies; Sebastiano Faro, Ginevra Peruginelli -- Part II. The Role of Books and Monographs in Social Siences Research and Their Evaluation -- Chapter 6. Quality Evaluation of Online Library Catalogs, of Advanced Discovery Tools and of Liked Data Technologies; Maria Teresa Biagetti, Antonella Iacono, Antonella Trombone -- Chapter 7. Research Quality Criteria in the Evaluation of Books; Carla Basili, Luca Lanzillo -- Chapter 8. The Evolving Role of Books in Research Practices of Humanities; Tiziana Lippiello, Ioana Galleron, Geoffrey Williams -- Chapter 9. Research Quality Criteria in the Evaluation of Legal Research Monographs; Sebastiano Faro and Ginevra Peruginelli -- Part III. Journal Classification and Rating -- Chapter 10. Validity and Robustness of Journal Rating; Andrea Bonaccorsi, Tindaro Cicero, Antonio Ferrara and Marco Malgarini -- Chapter 11. Strategies for Publication in International Journals in SSH; Domenica Stella Iezzi -- Chapter 12. The Role of Scientific Societies of Journal Rating: the Case of Humanities; Andrea Bonaccorsi and Antonio Ferrara -- Part IV. Exploring New Indicators for the Multilevel Assessment of Research -- Chapter 13. Exploring the Potential of Indicators Based on Google Scholar; Alfio Ferrara and Silvia Salini -- Chapter 14. Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Google Scholars Indicators: the Case of Social Sciences in Italy; Ferruccio Biolcati-Rinaldi and Silvia Salini -- Chapter 15. Are Digital Library Catalgs a Reliable Source in Research Assessment?; Maria Teresa Biagetti, Antonella Iacono and Antonella Trombone -- Chapter 16. Do Scholar in Social Sciences and Humanities Contribute to the Third Mission of Universities?: Evidence from an Assessment Exercise; Brigida Blasi, Sandra Romagnosi and Andrea Bonaccorsi -- Chapter 17. The Impact of Research in SSH; Luca Lanzillo -- Part V. What Do We Learn from the Italian Experience? -- Chapter 18. The International Debate on the Evaluation of SSH and the Italian Experience; Alesia Zuccalà.
000939674 506__ $$aAccess limited to authorized users.
000939674 520__ $$aThis book examines very important issues in research evaluation in the Social Sciences and Humanities. It is based on recent experiences carried out in Italy (2011-2015) in the fields of research assessment, peer review, journal classification, and construction of indicators, and presents a systematic review of theoretical issues influencing the evaluation of Social Sciences and Humanities. Several chapters analyse original data made available through research assessment exercises. Other chapters are the result of dedicated and independent research carried out in 2014-2015 aimed at addressing some of the debated and open issues, for example in the evaluation of books, the use of Library Catalog Analysis or Google Scholar, the definition of research quality criteria on internationalization, as well as opening the way to innovative indicators. The book is therefore a timely and important contribution to the international debate. .--$$cProvided by publisher.
000939674 588__ $$aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (viewed January 11, 2018).
000939674 650_0 $$aSocial sciences$$xResearch.
000939674 650_0 $$aHumanities$$xResearch.
000939674 7001_ $$aBonaccorsi, Andrea,$$eeditor.
000939674 77608 $$iPrint version:$$z9783319685533
000939674 852__ $$bebk
000939674 85640 $$3SpringerLink$$uhttps://univsouthin.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-68554-0$$zOnline Access$$91397441.1
000939674 909CO $$ooai:library.usi.edu:939674$$pGLOBAL_SET
000939674 980__ $$aEBOOK
000939674 980__ $$aBIB
000939674 982__ $$aEbook
000939674 983__ $$aOnline
000939674 994__ $$a92$$bISE