What can't be said : paradox and contradiction in East Asian thought / Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, Graham Priest, and Robert H. Sharf.
2021
B5165 .D44 2021
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Linked e-resources
Linked Resource
Details
Title
What can't be said : paradox and contradiction in East Asian thought / Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, Graham Priest, and Robert H. Sharf.
Author
ISBN
9780197526217 (electronic book)
Published
New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2021.
Language
English
Description
1 online resource (204 pages).
Call Number
B5165 .D44 2021
Dewey Decimal Classification
165
Summary
Paradox drives a good deal of philosophy in every tradition. In the Indian & Western traditions, there is a tendency among many philosophers to run from contradiction & paradox. If & when a contradiction appears in a theory, it is regarded as a sure sign that something has gone amiss. This aversion to paradox commits them, knowingly or not, to the view that reality must be consistent. In East Asia, however, philosophers have reacted to paradox differently. Many East Asian philosophers - both in the Daoist & the Buddhist traditions - have openly embraced paradox. They have taken compelling arguments for contradictory positions to suggest that the world is - at least in some respects, & often in very deep respects - inconsistent, & that our best theories of the world will therefore be inconsistent. This book is an initial survey of the writings of some influential East Asian thinkers who were committed to paradox, & for good reason.
Note
Paradox drives a good deal of philosophy in every tradition. In the Indian & Western traditions, there is a tendency among many philosophers to run from contradiction & paradox. If & when a contradiction appears in a theory, it is regarded as a sure sign that something has gone amiss. This aversion to paradox commits them, knowingly or not, to the view that reality must be consistent. In East Asia, however, philosophers have reacted to paradox differently. Many East Asian philosophers - both in the Daoist & the Buddhist traditions - have openly embraced paradox. They have taken compelling arguments for contradictory positions to suggest that the world is - at least in some respects, & often in very deep respects - inconsistent, & that our best theories of the world will therefore be inconsistent. This book is an initial survey of the writings of some influential East Asian thinkers who were committed to paradox, & for good reason.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Access Note
Access limited to authorized users.
Source of Description
Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on January 13, 2021).
Series
Oxford scholarship online.
Available in Other Form
Print version: 9780197526187
Linked Resources
Record Appears in