Linked e-resources
Details
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements; Executive Summary ; Contents; List of Abbreviations; List of Figures; List of Tables; Chapter 1; Introduction; 1.1 The NP Argument; 1.1.1 Empirical Dimension; 1.1.2 Normative Dimension; 1.2 The Social Conservationist Argument; 1.2.1 Empirical Dimension; 1.2.2 Normative Dimension; 1.3 Growth of MPAs; 1.4 Structure of the Book; The Rise and Rise of the Marine Reserves 'Bandwagon'; Chapter 2; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Policy Networks; 2.2.1 Epistemic Community; 2.2.2 Advocacy Coalitions; 2.3 Conclusion; Bibliometric Test of the MR 'Bandwagon'; Chapter 3; 3.1 Introduction
3.2 Methods3.2.1 Social Network Analysis; 3.2.2 Citation Analysis; 3.3 Results and Discussion; 3.4 Conclusion; Chapter 4; Bias in the Peer-reviewed Literature, and Crossing the Science/Policy Divide; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Pro-MR Bias; 4.2.1 Methods; 4.2.2 Results and Discussion; Journal Editor and Reviewer Bias; Author Self-Censorship; 4.3 The Science/Policy Divide; 4.3.1 The Linear Model; 4.3.2 The Deliberative Model; 4.3.3 Is Scientific Advocacy of MRs Acceptable?; 4.4 Conclusion; Chapter 5; Critique of the Scientific Evidence for Fisheries Benefits of MRs; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Methods
5.2.1 Data Collection5.2.2 Literature Classification; 5.3 Results; 5.3.1 Empirical Studies; Number of Empirical Studies; Type of MPA Studied; Ecosystems and Habitats Studied; Main Groups of Species Studied; Empirical Research Effort per Marine Province; 'Quality' of Empirical Field Studies; 5.3.2 Theoretical Studies; 5.4 Discussion; 5.4.1 Drawbacks of Targets; 5.4.2 Skewed Focus of Literature; 5.4.3 Mixed Evidence; 5.4.4 Difficulties of Enforcement; 5.5 Conclusion; Chapter 6; Case Study of the 'English Patient'; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 Sources of Data; 6.3 Results and Discussion
6.3.1 Planning Work Preceding MCAA Drafting (1999-2006)6.3.2 Planning of MCZs (2006-present); Controversy over the Objectives of MCZs; Controversy over Data Deficiencies; Controversy Over Time-Scales; Controversy Over Consultation; Controversy Over Equity; 6.3.3 The Outcome of the MCZ Site Selection Process; 6.4 Conclusion; Chapter 7; Conclusion; 7.1 Introduction; 7.2 Summary; 7.3 Wider Implications; 7.3.1 Role of Politics in the MR Debate; 7.3.2 Role of Scientific Advocacy in the MR Debate; 7.3.3 Role of Stakeholders in the MR Debate; 7.3.4 Role of Caution in the MR Debate
7.3.5 Reconciliation Between NP and SC7.4 Conclusion; References; Index
3.2 Methods3.2.1 Social Network Analysis; 3.2.2 Citation Analysis; 3.3 Results and Discussion; 3.4 Conclusion; Chapter 4; Bias in the Peer-reviewed Literature, and Crossing the Science/Policy Divide; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Pro-MR Bias; 4.2.1 Methods; 4.2.2 Results and Discussion; Journal Editor and Reviewer Bias; Author Self-Censorship; 4.3 The Science/Policy Divide; 4.3.1 The Linear Model; 4.3.2 The Deliberative Model; 4.3.3 Is Scientific Advocacy of MRs Acceptable?; 4.4 Conclusion; Chapter 5; Critique of the Scientific Evidence for Fisheries Benefits of MRs; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Methods
5.2.1 Data Collection5.2.2 Literature Classification; 5.3 Results; 5.3.1 Empirical Studies; Number of Empirical Studies; Type of MPA Studied; Ecosystems and Habitats Studied; Main Groups of Species Studied; Empirical Research Effort per Marine Province; 'Quality' of Empirical Field Studies; 5.3.2 Theoretical Studies; 5.4 Discussion; 5.4.1 Drawbacks of Targets; 5.4.2 Skewed Focus of Literature; 5.4.3 Mixed Evidence; 5.4.4 Difficulties of Enforcement; 5.5 Conclusion; Chapter 6; Case Study of the 'English Patient'; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 Sources of Data; 6.3 Results and Discussion
6.3.1 Planning Work Preceding MCAA Drafting (1999-2006)6.3.2 Planning of MCZs (2006-present); Controversy over the Objectives of MCZs; Controversy over Data Deficiencies; Controversy Over Time-Scales; Controversy Over Consultation; Controversy Over Equity; 6.3.3 The Outcome of the MCZ Site Selection Process; 6.4 Conclusion; Chapter 7; Conclusion; 7.1 Introduction; 7.2 Summary; 7.3 Wider Implications; 7.3.1 Role of Politics in the MR Debate; 7.3.2 Role of Scientific Advocacy in the MR Debate; 7.3.3 Role of Stakeholders in the MR Debate; 7.3.4 Role of Caution in the MR Debate
7.3.5 Reconciliation Between NP and SC7.4 Conclusion; References; Index