I Challenging and Defending Judicial Review
1. Randomized Judicial Review; Andrei Marmor
2. On the Difficulty to Ground the Authority of Constitutional Courts: Can Strong Judicial Review be Morally Justified?; Thomas Bustamante
3. The Reasons without Vote: The Representative and Majoritarian Function of Constitutional Courts; Luís Roberto Barroso
II Constitutional Dialogues and Constitutional Deliberation
4. Decoupling Judicial Review From Judicial Supremacy; Stephen Gardbaum
5. Scope and limits of dialogic constitutionalism; Roberto Gargarella
6. A Defence of a Broader Sense of Constitutional Dialogues based on Jeremy Waldron's Criticism on Judicial Review; Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes
III Institutional Alternatives for Constitutional Changes
7. New Institutional Mechanisms for Making Constitutional Law; Mark Tushnet
8. Democratic Constitutional Change: Assessing Institutional Possibilities; Christopher Zurn
9. The Unconstitutionality of Constitutional Changes in Colombia: a Tension between Majoritatian and Constitutional Democracy; Gonzalo Ramírez Cleves
IV Constitutional Promises and Democratic Participation
10. Is there such thing as a radical constitution?; Vera Karam de Chueiri
11. Judicial reference to community values
A pointer towards constitutional juries?; Eric Ghosh
V Legal Theory and Constitutional Interpretation
12. Common Law Constitutionalism and the Written Constitution; Wil Waluchow and Katharina Stevens
13. On how law is not like chess
Dworkin and the theory of conceptual types; Ronaldo Porto Macedo Júnior. .